680 words
3 minutes
Mastering Desirability: Applying the Innovator's Gift to DBB

Module 2 — Desirability#

Master Summary: Applying the Innovator’s Gift to DBB#

Context 🛠️#

Desirability, for me, is about making my product irresistible to my customers. In this section, I combine the core lessons of Module 2 Part 1 with the Digital Bulletin Board (DBB) to show how the Innovator’s Gift guides my thinking on UVP, positioning, and adoption strategy.

The goal is to ensure that DBB doesn’t just exist—it pulls people away from the old way and into a solution I’ve designed.


Step 1 — Identify My True Competition#

Innovation, I’ve learned, isn’t about beating a shiny startup—it’s about causing a switch from the old way to my new way.

For DBB, the old way includes:

  • Physical bulletin boards in city halls
  • PDFs posted on municipal websites
  • Email distributions of agendas

The bigger context for DBB is citizen access and legal compliance. By identifying the true competition, I can anchor my UVP against the actual alternatives people are already using.

Without this step, I risk solving the wrong problem or targeting the wrong competition.

flowchart TD TRUECOMP[DBB: True Competition] OLD[Old Way] BIG[Big Context] TRUECOMP --> OLD TRUECOMP --> BIG OLD --> PB[Physical bulletin boards] OLD --> PDF[PDF agendas on websites] OLD --> EMAIL[Email distribution lists] BIG --> ACCESS[Citizen access] BIG --> COMPLIANCE[Legal compliance]

Step 2 — Describe What’s Broken with the Old Way#

Contrast creates value. People only notice the problems they experience. For DBB, I identified these problems:

  • Manual posting inefficiency: City clerks spend hours printing and posting agendas.
  • Limited accessibility: Residents often cannot check physical boards or printed schedules.
  • Compliance risk: Meeting agendas must be posted 48–72 hours in advance, and errors create legal exposure.

These problems are specific, familiar, and compelling—conditions that make a switch possible. Even small frustrations, when consistent, can trigger change if a better alternative exists.

flowchart TD PROB[Problems with Old Way] PROB --> P1[Manual posting inefficiency] PROB --> P2[Limited accessibility] PROB --> P3[Compliance risk:<br/>48–72hr posting<br/>requirement]

Step 3 — Craft a 3x–10x Better UVP#

My UVP must overcome inertia and friction by promising a significantly better experience. For DBB, I defined:

UVP:
“Publish City Meeting Agendas Digitally — Accessible Anytime, Compliant, and Effortless.”

To reinforce the pull:

  1. Contrast Creates Value — I show what residents and clerks lose with the old way.
  2. Position as Emotionally Better — I reduce anxiety for city clerks by making compliance simple, and I empower residents to stay informed.
  3. Think Different, Not Better — I offer instant notifications, mobile access, and automated scheduling, which breaks the old rules of time-consuming manual posting.

By applying these strategies, DBB does more than incrementally improve the old system—it makes switching obvious.

flowchart TD UVP[UVP for DBB] UVP_TEXT["Publish City Meeting<br/>Agendas Digitally:<br/>Accessible,<br/>Compliant,<br/>Effortless"] UVP --> UVP_TEXT subgraph STRAT[Positioning Strategies] C[Contrast<br/>creates value] E[Position as<br/>emotionally better] D[Think different,<br/>not better] end UVP --> STRAT STRAT --> C STRAT --> E STRAT --> D

Key Takeaways ✅#

  • Desirability, to me, is anchored in the problems of the old way, not the features I build.
  • Identifying the true competition requires exploring the bigger context of my product.
  • My UVP must be significantly better, pulling people through contrast, emotion, and differentiated positioning.
  • Even small, familiar frustrations can create opportunities for innovation if addressed meaningfully.
  • Visuals and flowcharts help me map the journey from old way → switch for clarity and alignment.
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 80, 'rankSpacing': 80}}}%% flowchart TD DBB[Digital Bulletin Board - Desirability] subgraph COMP[Step 1: Identify True Competition] OLDWAY[Old Way:<br/>Physical bulletin boards,<br/>PDFs,<br/>Email lists] CONTEXT[Bigger Context: Citizen access<br/>&<br/>legal compliance] end subgraph PROB[Step 2: Describe What's Broken] P1[Manual posting inefficiency] P2[Limited accessibility] P3[Compliance risk:<br/>48–72hr posting<br/>requirement] end subgraph UVP[Step 3: Craft a 3x–10x Better UVP] UVP_TEXT["Publish City Meeting<br/>Agendas Digitally:<br/>Accessible,<br/>Compliant,<br/>Effortless"] STRATEGIES[Strategies:<br/>Contrast,<br/>Emotion,<br/>Think Different] end DBB --> COMP DBB --> PROB DBB --> UVP COMP --> OLDWAY COMP --> CONTEXT PROB --> P1 PROB --> P2 PROB --> P3 UVP --> UVP_TEXT UVP --> STRATEGIES

Next Steps 🚀#

  1. I review DBB’s current Lean Canvas and annotate the old way, problems, and UVP.
  2. I validate my UVP with early adopters: city clerks and municipal IT teams.
  3. I iterate the positioning strategies based on feedback and observed inertia.
  4. I use this master summary as a reference for all future Desirability exercises.

This master post combines all Module 2 Part 1 lessons into a single, actionable framework for DBB, helping me see both the conceptual and applied sides of Desirability.

Mastering Desirability: Applying the Innovator's Gift to DBB
https://www.juliogonzalez.space/posts/module-2/part-1/m2-pt1-summary/
Author
julio c gonzalez solano
Published at
2025-12-03
License
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Some information may be outdated