Module 2 — Feasibility
Assessing Feasibility: Can I Successfully Implement My Business Model?
Context 🛠️
When I think about feasibility, the first question I tend to ask is: Can I build this? For the Digital Bulletin Board (DBB), I know the question goes beyond coding a system to publish city meeting agendas. I need to ask: Can I successfully implement my business model?
Feasibility extends beyond the solution itself. I must answer:
- Do I have the right team or resources?
- Do I have a realistic timeline to deliver traction?
Most founders approach these in the order of solution → team → timeline. I choose to start with minimum success criteria (MSC)—the traction I absolutely need to prove the idea works. Once I define MSC, I can determine the solution, the team, and a realistic timeline.
Say No to Product Roadmaps
Traditional product roadmaps assume I know exactly what to build, which dictates who I need and how long it will take. For DBB, I know a full roadmap for feature releases would likely be a distraction.
Instead of a detailed roadmap, I focus on traction roadmaps, which are outcome-oriented. They prioritize milestones that indicate a working business model, not every feature I might want to build.
A Better Way — Traction Roadmaps
A traction roadmap charts the path from idea to product/market fit based on minimum success criteria, not best-case projections. For DBB, my traction roadmap focuses on measurable outcomes:
- Gaining initial paying city customers
- Demonstrating repeatable onboarding
- Achieving baseline ARR ($1k/month subscriptions)
This roadmap keeps me accountable while allowing flexibility to adjust the solution and team. Instead of obsessing over features, I focus on outcomes that matter: traction and learning.
In the next post, I’ll chart DBB’s roadmap with a 10X yearly growth assumption and translate it into actionable milestones.
Some information may be outdated